While China is slightly larger in land area than the U.S. (by about 72,000 sq. km), America’s GDP is over $10 trillion higher. Meanwhile, Russia and Canada—two of the largest countries—fall behind in economic output, illustrating the lack of a strong link between size and GDP.

Does Geographic Size Influence GDP?

Looking at this data, there’s no strong correlation between landmass and economic output. According to a 2023 research paper, GDP is more strongly influenced by population and infrastructure than sheer physical size.

For instance, India, with only a third of the U.S. or China’s landmass, ranks third in GDP due to its massive population and growing industrial base. On the flip side, Australia and Canada boast vast territories but smaller populations, limiting their economic scale.

Outliers That Punch Above Their Weight

Several countries in the visualization illustrate this dynamic vividly:

• Japan and Germany: Relatively small in landmass but economic powerhouses, ranking high in global GDP.
• Indonesia: The fourth most populous country, yet its GDP lags behind similarly sized countries due to development disparities.
• Brazil: A mix of large area and moderate economic power, it sits in the middle of the pack.

As this chart shows, while landmass can support economic activity (through agriculture, resource extraction, etc.), it does not guarantee high GDP. In fact, many of the most prosperous countries are relatively small but highly industrialized and urbanized.

Información extraída de: https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/country-size-and-gdp/